Voting machine fraud

Since the early voting began there have been reports in such states as North Carolina that the voting machines are behaving oddly.  In North Carolina, for example, there have been several reports of the voting machines flipping the intentions of the electors. 

This "flipping" works in the following way: the person inputs their voting intention - a straight Republican ticket - that person then checks before submitting the vote. Instead of the machine showing straight Republican it shows straight Democrat. There have been reports that it took 5 goes before the machine would show the intended result. 

The North Carolina GOP is on top of this situation and they have issued a statement regarding what really amounts to voting machine fraud in several counties.  What you must know about this situation is the following:

Additional skepticism surrounds this situation due to the fact that the company responsible for the sale, distribution and maintenance of these machines has made headlines recently for questionable dealings in obtaining state contracts. Knowing that the ownership of the company in question, Printelect, has strong ties to the North Carolina Democratic Party and that the company itself holds a virtual monopoly on ballot printing and equipment maintenance for the state has only fueled suspicions. 

Did you see what I saw? The company who supplied the voting machines has strong ties to the North Carolina Democratic Party, and it holds a virtual monopoly  on ballot printing and equipment maintenance. Did you get that? The company has strong ties to the North Carolina Democrats. Voter fraud anyone? 

So many reports - where do I start? The Fake Tea Party Candidates

There is more than one fake Tea Party Candidate.  I have seen reports about fake Tea Party candidates in New Jersey, Nevada, Florida and Michigan.  The most well known of these is Ashijan in Nevada because he is a mate of Harry Reid, and the purpose is to siphon off votes from Sharron Angle. However, the first of these stories is about the candidate in New Jersey, spoiler who has been set up in the Rundle vs. Adler race.

Liberty Chick writing for Big Government has a really good synopsis of the whole story. However, there is a new twist, and this is something that really needs to be investigated. DeStefano ads have popped up as Googleads.  Please check my link where you can clearly see the design of the ad, as well as the way in which it is meant to lend TEA Party legitimacy to this fake candidate.

To get on the ballot, the candidate needed to have 100 signatures. This was achieved with the co-operation of young DNC volunteers in the area.  Congressman Adler has denied knowledge of the scheme.

The purpose of this fake candidate is to siphon off the conservative vote from Rundle. It is an attempt to confuse the voters, especially those who tend to think that the TEA movement is a political party, which I might add is clearly not the case at this point in time. 

My understanding of the TEA movement is that it involves people from both the Democrat Party, Republican Party, as well as Independents and Libertarians. In the past there have been Libertarian candidates, and there have been candidates from other minor parties, including those watermelons known as the Green Party (they pretend to be Green but they are in fact Marxists through and through).  In fact it would seem that there are a lot of Democrats involved in the TEA movement.

In each of the cases that are known though, it is the Democrat candidate that has set up the fake TEA Party candidate. First there was Harry Reid assisting Ashijan to be the spoiler and fake candidate, then there was the fake candidate in Florida, then another popped up in Michigan, followed by the revelations in New Jersey. What each of these fake candidates have in common is that they are not known by those involved in the TEA movement. They are not endorsed by the TEA movement.

Election Fraud

Election fraud is nothing new, and I do not think that there is one country that is immune to election fraud. Last year, when Iran erupted into riots, the cause of the rioting was the announcement that Ahmahnutjob had won the Presidential race when it was clear to the large turnout of people that this was not the case. 

Since then, Australia has had an election. Whilst it is not clear that there was fraud, I am certain that it was attempted. One method that came into play this year was tied up to the court system giving the go ahead for people to turn up on polling day with the intent of casting provisional votes. In some electorates the majority of these provisional votes were rejected. I should add here that provisional voting is one way in which fraud can be perpetrated.

The issue at the present time though, is the voter fraud, or at least the potential for voter fraud in the USA during the current election cycle. The subject of the voter fraud in the USA is one that is complex, yet what is clear is that the majority of the voter fraud that is committed happens on the Democrat side of the aisle.  This will be the subject of a series of posts as I attempt to trace the roots of the voter fraud, which in reality goes back to the era of Reconstruction, and to the beginnings of the KKK.